CLASS |
B |
||
PHASE |
Idea generation |
||
DESCRIPTION |
INTRODUCTION The NGT technique will take advantage of pooled judgments. That means that the judgments of a variety of people with varied talents, knowledge, and skills will be used together. By doing this, the resulting ideas are likely to be better than those that might be obtained by other methods. OVERVIEW Procedures
*This exercise is based heavily on the ideas presented in Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., and Gustafson, D. H., Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes, (1975), Scott, Foresman and Company. Benefits
Limitations
PREPARATORY TASKS The Meeting Room Supplies Opening Statement
CONDUCTING THE SESSION Step 1: Silent Generation of Ideas in Writing The first step of the NGT meeting is to have group members write key ideas silently and independently. This is done to:
To accomplish this step, the leader must:
The following is an example of how the leader might start Step 1 of the NGT process:
Here are some suggestions for the leader during this first step of the NGT process:
Step 2: Round-Robin Recording of Ideas The second step of NGT is to record the ideas of group members on a flip chart visible to the entire group. Round-robin recording means going around the table and asking for one idea from one member at a time. The leader writes the idea of a group member on the flip chart and then proceeds to ask for one idea from the next group member, and so on. Some of the advantages of this approach include:
To accomplish this step, the leader will behave as outlined in the following statement which should be made by the group leader: During the last five minutes, each of us has used
our worksheets to list ideas for dealing with today's issues. Now I
would like to have each of you share your ideas with the other members
of the group. This is an important step because our list of ideas will
constitute a guide for further discussion, help us understand the richness
of ideas we have to work with, and stimulate additional ideas. To accomplish
this goal as quickly and efficiently as possible, I am going to go around
the table and ask individuals, one at a time, to give me one idea from
their worksheet, summarized in a brief phrase or a few words. After
the entire list is on the board, we will have the opportunity to discuss,
clarify and dispute the ideas. If someone else in the group lists an
idea which you also had on your worksheet, you need not repeat the idea.
If, however, in your judgment the idea on your worksheet contains a
different emphasis or variation, we would welcome the idea. Variations
on a theme are important and will help us to be creative. [Turning to
the first person in the group, the leader now asks:] Would you please
give me one idea from your list?
The following are some suggestions for the leader to follow at this stage:
Step 3: Serial Discussion The purpose of the third step of the NGT method is to discuss each idea in turn for the purpose of clarification. Advantages of this step include:
The leader's responsibilities at this stage are shown in the following example of comments which should be made by the leader: Now that we have listed our ideas on the flip chart,
I want us to take time to go back and briefly discuss each idea. The
purpose of this discussion is to clarify the meaning of each item on
our flip chart. It is also the opportunity to express our understanding
of the logic behind the idea and the relative importance of the item.
We should feel free to express varying points of view or to disagree.
We will, however, want to pace ourselves so that each of the items on
the chart receives the opportunity for some attention, so I may sometimes
ask the group to move on to further items. Finally, let me point out
that the creator of the idea being discussed need not feel obliged to
clarify or explain an item. Any member of the group can play that role.
[Going to the flip chart, the leader points to the first item and says:]
"Are there any questions or comments group members would like to
make about this first item?" [This is then repeated with each idea.]
Step 4: Preliminary Vote The purpose of this step is to aggregate the judgments of individual members to determine the relative importance of individual items. The procedure for Step 4 is clearly shown in the directions given by the leader as follows:
We have now completed our discussion of the entire list of ideas, have clarified the meaning of each idea, and have discussed the areas of agreement and disagreement. At this time, I would like to have the judgment of each group member concerning the most important ideas on the list. To accomplish this step, you should each take five index cards. I would like you to select the five most important items from our list of items. This will require careful thought and effort on your part. As you look at the flip chart sheets and find an item which you feel is very important, please record the item on an index card. [At this point, the leader goes to the flip chart and draws an index card.] Please place the number of the item in the upper left-hand corner of the card. For example, if you feel Item 13 is very important to you, you would write 13 in the upper left-hand corner. [At this point, the leader should write 13 in the upper left-hand corner of the card s/he has drawn on the flip chart.] Then, write the identifying words or phrase on the card. [At this point, the leader writes the phrase for Item 13 on the card s/he has drawn.] Do this for each of the five most important items from our total list. When you have completed this task, you should have five cards, each with a separate phrase written on the card and with identifying numbers using the numbering system from our list of ideas on the flip chart. Do not rank-order the cards yet. Spend the next few minutes carefully selecting the five items. We will rank-order the cards together. Are there any questions?
[After each member of the group has selected five
items and written them on separate cards, the leader says the following]:
Please spread out your cards in front of you so you can see all five
at once. Looking at your set of five cards, decide which one card is
the most important. Which card is more important than the other four
cards? [At this point the leader gives the group time to study their
cards.] Please write a number "5" in the lower right-hand
corner of the card. Turn that card over and look at the remaining four
cards. Of the remaining four cards, which is the least important? Write
a number "1" in the lower right-hand corner. Now choose the
most important of the remaining three cards and write the number "4"
in the lower right-hand corner. Now choose the less important of the
remaining two cards and write the number "2" in the lower
right-hand corner. Now write the number "3" in the lower right-hand
corner of the remaining card.
The remaining parts of Step 4 are as follows:
Optional Steps If desired, two additional steps can be added to the process. Step 5 adds a brief discussion held after the group sees the ratings of the entire group. This discussion focuses on those ideas that were most highly rated during the preliminary vote and again concentrates on clarification of the issues. After this discussion, the leader proceeds to Step 6, in which a new (final) vote is taken. The final vote is then tallied to identify the group's most favored actions. Adaptation for ill-structured problemsModification of NGT, undertaken by Bartunek and Murnighan (1984), helps to deal with ill-structrued problems. Normal ideas are generated and listed, followed by the facilitator questioning if the ideas are relevant to the same problem. If not, the problem is said to be ill-structured and the ideas generated are clustered into coherent groups (see Snowball technique). These clusters of ill-structured ideas are then treated as problems in their own right and the NGT procedure is applied to them. Regular breaks are taken by the participants to ensure the group feel they are still working on the original problem Adaptation for greater anonymityUseful where low trust conditions exist i.e. the presence
of significant status or stakeholder differences. (see Improved Nominal
Group Technique INGT) See example: Using the Nominal Group Technique to Select the most Appropriate Topics for Postgraduate Research Students' Seminars
Source:
|
||
CORRELATE
TECHNIQUES |
|||
REFERENCES |
|