| CLASS |
A |
| PHASE |
External Mapping |
| APPLICATION FIELDS |
Strategic Planning, Product Development
|
| ASSUMPTIONS |
This technique has no requirements. |
| PROS |
Users develop a critical ability
in order to notice all the “imperfections” that are present
in their company’s market. |
| CONS |
The author does not suggest steps
for finding out opportunities but gives a general treatment of his technique,
suitable for any function in the firm. |
| DESCRIPTION |
The subject of this technique is market analysis, in order to realize ongoing changes. Users have to look for what is considered “imperfect” in the market. Imperfections in some way may become good opportunities from other points of view and strong potential advantages. Imperfection, being lack of something, distance from something, restlessness, incompleteness, if viewed dynamically is never total, is never all or nothing, but becomes opportunity for change, movement, research, improving boost. [Varvelli, 1995, p.18]The aim of this technique is to detect inconsistencies, imperfections of markets which make them evolve over time. The most important indicators in order to understand changes are two:
Contradiction is a precious source of innovation for two reasons: In the first case the contradiction rising inside a system can be interpreted as a suggestion that good functioning may be compromised if the system is not modified. Contradictions which show themselves as events not consistent to expectations, say that the system may be running correctly if malfunctions are handled in good time. Example: The presence of contradictions in a systems shows that remedy and innovation are needed in order to take the system back to good functioning. In the second case, contradiction is meant as the result of a given point of view. Connecting the opposites, making consistent in real terms what seems inconsistent, is the meaning of creativity. The author asserts that contraposition between opposite elements does not really exist in real world, or rather it is function of a single point of view. But there is at least one other point which enables the viewer to see two phenomena as wholly compatible, even though still different and conflictual. |
| REFERENCES |
|