CLASS |
D |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PHASE |
Predisposition |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DESCRIPTION |
The sequential-attributes matrix, originally developed by J.D.Brooks, simply applies product modification checklists to items that consist of a sequentially connected element – for instance a production process, an administrative procedure, or a problem-solving method. It is also useful for physically connected sequences of components (e.g. a drill can be thought of as an interdependent sequence: hole, handle, screw, plug, power) Checklists such as Osborn’s Checklist (qv), and many of the attribute based idea-generating methods, are inclined to handle lists of components and attributes as if each item could be altered independently of the others. However, this is rarely true, and in cases where the components are stages in an overall process, interdependence is particularly strong. Whilst Brooks’ method does not give a great deal of help in its handling of sequential constraints, it at least draws attention to their existence.
Table for applying a checklist to a set of sequentially constrained items
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CORRELATE
TECHNIQUES |