CLASS |
C |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PHASE |
Idea generation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DESCRIPTION |
This technique requires you to alter the meanings of key words in the problem statement (or any sentence that contains key words) to reveal assumptions and generate alternative perceptions. See also Boundary Examination, and the software packages: Batmemes, and Paramind. Replacing Key words with SynonymsThis method devised by De Bono (1970) requires you to identify key words in the sentence, substitute them one at a time with other words that have the equivalent general meaning, and create different emphases and a different rhetoric. It can be achieved in a simple and informal way from general knowledge, or at a deeper level with imaginative use of a thesaurus. E.g. look at the example below, which an average word-processor thesaurus gave the direct and indirect synonyms for the 3 key words in the problem statement:
Altering just one word at a time produces very distinct shifts in the meaning and boundary assumptions such as:
Obviously the amount of potential paraphrasing is very large, just using the synonyms in the table above, this simple problem statement may well be reworded in at least 1000 (10 x 10 x 10) ways, many of which correspond to very different meanings. Paraphrasing as such can be used either to alter the problem statement itself, or to trigger different streams of ideas about possible solutions. Use Synonym Pairs to Trigger IdeasA variation of the method above devised by Olson (1980) takes just 2 key words from the problem statement (ideally a grammatically linked pair such as noun-verb, verb-noun, verb-adverb, adjective-noun), generates lists of synonyms for each word (as above), and then uses word pairs generated from the 2 synonym lists to stimulate ideas. For example: [Source: www.mycoted.com] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CORRELATE
TECHNIQUES |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REFERENCES |
|