DESCRIPTION |
The creative technique of Deliberate Combination
is based upon a company evolutionist approach. Vicari (1998) states
that evolution is a process that generates creativity in any organization.
Furthermore, the author states that innovation
is a genetic mutation between two generations, which develops a wide
range of possibilities; without such mutation our learning capacity
would fade away.
“What provokes the continous reduction
of our learning capacity is the fact that mutations generate new opportunities
which were not envisaged in our preexisting genetic tissue. Innovation
is simply about modifying past elements.” (Vicari, 1998)
The deliberate combination of preexisting elements is a technique aimed
to generate change.
“The generation of different elements…may
arise from the deliberate combination of preexisting elements,
briefly, a construction. A combination of action unities and changes
that result in a new unity.
The basic elements for innovation are prior to innovation which derives
from their original rearrangement. For example, Henry Ford combined
the order clearing process used by a mail-order sale company with
the mechanic car assembly process. As a matter of fact, both processes
existed on their own. The innovation which changed the course of history
is represented by the combination of something already in existence.
Another example taken from the car industry is that of kanban which
was developed by Toyota.
Example 1
The two major pillars of the Toyota
system are just in time and self-motivation. Kanban is used to make
them operational. The kanban idea derived from the observation of
an American supermarket organization.
In 1956, during one of my business travels to the United States, I
visited the production plants at the General Motors, at Ford and in
other factories. However, I was most impressed by the huge number
of supermarkets in that country.
To compare cars and supermarkets can appear quite odd. However, for
a long time, after examining the organization of an American supermarket,
we analyzed parallels between the supermarket production system and
car production through the so called just in time. A supermarket is
a place where customers can take what they need in the desired time
and quantity.
From the supermarket concept we borrowed a crucial idea: there is
a process “at the source” of the production line, which
is a kind of shop and a ” following” process (customer)
which moves on to the initial process (supermarket) to purchase what
needed (goods) in the desired time and quantity. Then the initial
process suddenly produces the quantity that was just removed (shelf
stocking)1.
[…] As well as the basic elements
of biologic evolution are virtually not finite in nature, the basic
elements of company evolution are available in large quantity.
Therefore an essential aspect of creativity is to modify things already
in existence, id. basic elements, new elementary components, useful
to innovation building. For example, it is necessary to develop new
ideas, new projects, new products and new initiatives.
To this purpose, the company can either use the material which was
produced autonomously, by chance or by mistake, or provoke intentional
variations. The problem does not concern the availability of elementary
variations: their use is small if compared to their availability.
Briefly, the problem is to realize when a combination of existing
elements forms a new independent unity.
Henry Ford worked out his assembly line idea examining the order clearing
system of a mail-order sale company. However, we could ask ourselves
whether the activity of a salesman working for a mail-order sale company
had ever been detected in the past by other entrepreneurs or managers
from a production company. Or whether a clerk’s activity had
ever been compared to a worker’s activity. It had probably occured
in the past: mail-order companies were visited from time to time by
theit suppliers...It had probably occurred far more than once but
– given the same situation - nobody else had ever seen what
Ford realized. Henry Ford’s idea differed from any previous
remark or association because it was acknowledged as a brand new concept
or process.
The available material for innovation was exactly the same; however,
he realized its importance for innovation. His perception of change
from the existing material made the difference.
You could wonder: when is a new combination acknowledged as such?
It is when you face a new problem. In any case, it is when any association
helps to solve a given problem that was already in existence or that
was developed together with that association.
“There is an endless number of possible alternatives but they
are not usually taken into great consideration. In fact, they are
not seen as something new. The reason is that they cannot provoke
any relevant disturbances within the organization, because the system
is not problematic enough and therefore it does not need any new variation.
However, solutions can only derive from problems and only existing
variations - evident to the many – are considered as something
new.
Looking for variations helps to realize that a change in the system
could be a potential solution to any given problem. If considered
in a different time, the same change would not be perceived as a real
change or as something new.
How often do managers or common people come across solutions borrowed
from others’ mind? And how often do you overlook new ideas?
What we sometimes call luck is nothing else than a synchronism between
a problem and its solution” (Vicari, 1998)
|